> The Guardian calculated that third graders – students aged eight or nine – who have grown up within two miles of Portland International Raceway could experience more than a six percentage point decline in their standardized test scores.
How did they calculate this? Leaded gas is only used in specialty or vintage race cars. There are less than a dozen applicable events in a year. They are claiming a larger drop in IQ than the population had when every single car was running leaded gas.
I'm not defending the use of leaded gas, but being next to an airfield is probably much, much worse in the amount of lead exposure.
"Standardized test" is pretty vague. I remember reading about drops in IQ scores which are on a scale centered around 100 where anything outside 50-150 is really exceptional (many tests don't go higher than that), whereas the SAT runs from 400-1600 which is a swing about 10x higher, so maybe 6 pts on the SAT is like 0.6 on IQ.
The difference between the airfield and the racetrack is that the race car could be switched to some other high octane gas or you could race some other kind of car whereas for general aviation you really don't want an engine to fail when you're in the air and the industry is both essential and moribund at the same time so you it's hard to ask people to get new planes or new engines.
Yeah, airfield. Some older planes are still allowed to use leaded gas because no alternative has been found that works with their engines. And our regulatory system is all about minimizing risk of any given activity, not in minimizing the overall risk to people.
So this is not quite true about when leaded gasoline is used. It is generally used in track specific cars. Vintage cars have long been retrofitted to not need let it gasoline. If those vintage cars have not been retrofitted it's fine because they literally don't put enough stress on the engines to need it.
But there are street legal cars that have a track mode which changes the tune on the car and bypasses the catalytic converters while in that mode. The optimized tune can require 100+ octane gas. The way this is typically achieved is by taking a 118 octane leaded gas that is sold at the race track and mixing it with a lower octane gas to get the octane rating you need for your tune.
Leaded it gas is not actually required to do this. It's just what's used because it's, probably, cheaper than unleaded alternatives. Additionally with unleaded alternative fuels that have very high octanes they generally require a different tune on your car. Because even for racers you can get ethanol blended gas or even pure ethanol which has a high enough octane rating but the tune on your vehicle is different because how it burns in the engine is different.
So typically changes like this don't really happen until there is legislation that pushes the conversion to happen. Which it is long past time for leaded gasoline to completely disappear in every aspect. If there is still some exceedingly limited niche then it needs to be sold as an additive which is controlled and you must show you have a need for this. Although I'm really not sure what that need would be at this point.
Some small engine airplanes do still use leaded gas. I'm not sure if they still do this but as part of pre-flight checks on those small airplanes they would check the gas to make sure it is the correct gas for the plane and then just dump that out onto the ground after they validated it. There's literally no reason for piston engine aircraft to continue to use leaded gasoline either. Especially considering that aircraft are highly regulated with the number of hours that can be on an engine before it's torn down and rebuild. There is plenty of opportunity to update these to unleaded.
What I don't see in the Guardian articles is any measurement of lead levels in the neighboring air and soil, and the difference between that and neighborhoods away from racetracks and airports.
It's shocking that race tracks are still allowed to use leaded gas. Anyone who's using leaded gasoline has a dedicated track only car, so they're not switching between street use and track use. The benefits of leaded gasoline have long sense past and there are suitable replacements that provide the same benefits. Additionally engines that were built for leaded gasoline use that are still in track cars today would have been rebuilt and could have the necessary modifications to not use leaded gasoline.
Farm equipment and certain other off-road equipment might still need leaded gas depending on the situation. This would be typically fairly old equipment at this point, as in 40+ year-old equipment. I certainly wouldn't want to buy any food from a farmer that is still using a leaded gas to power their equipment. That same equipment, if it is not then rebuilt, is likely spewing lots of other dangerous emissions you would not want in your food supply. So I would think that if you still wanted to run let it gasoline for any off-road purpose you should have to justify its use.
I had a John Deere 420 [1] from the 1950s when I first got my farm. It ran great on unleaded but was killed when we switched it from the straight 20 oil specified for it that had become impossible to find to modern multi-viscosity oil -- the gaskets all failed. We traded it in to a tractor enthusiast and replaced it with this tractor [2]
> suitable replacements that provide the same benefits
Eh. It's basically impossible to get past 105 octane on unleaded fuel. Whereas leaded fuels could get you up to 118.
Obviously modern sports cars are designed with much lower compression ratios in mind. But if you are showing off historic engine designs, some of them won't even run without leaded fuels.
No I'm not talking about street cars I'm talking about track only race cars. There is absolutely replacements for this that do not contain lead. Here is only one example.
Yes, I understand. But most of the events that PIR runs are using street cars or modern racing series that use lower octane fuels.
But there are also certain events where people are absolutely bringing out 40-50 year old drag racers.
I don't believe that particular product you have linked to has been on the market for over a decade. I suspect the additives they used in place of lead were probably even worse. If you can find an unleaded racing fuel above 110 octane for sale today I will happily eat my words.
The product I linked is 116 octane and is unleaded and does not contain ethanol. I am not exactly sure how long it's been on the market but doing a simple search I can find people referencing it all the way back to 2017.
So at this point even for super high octane needs there is no requirement for running a leaded gasoline anymore and hasn't been for some time.
> The Guardian calculated that third graders – students aged eight or nine – who have grown up within two miles of Portland International Raceway could experience more than a six percentage point decline in their standardized test scores.
How did they calculate this? Leaded gas is only used in specialty or vintage race cars. There are less than a dozen applicable events in a year. They are claiming a larger drop in IQ than the population had when every single car was running leaded gas.
I'm not defending the use of leaded gas, but being next to an airfield is probably much, much worse in the amount of lead exposure.
"Standardized test" is pretty vague. I remember reading about drops in IQ scores which are on a scale centered around 100 where anything outside 50-150 is really exceptional (many tests don't go higher than that), whereas the SAT runs from 400-1600 which is a swing about 10x higher, so maybe 6 pts on the SAT is like 0.6 on IQ.
The difference between the airfield and the racetrack is that the race car could be switched to some other high octane gas or you could race some other kind of car whereas for general aviation you really don't want an engine to fail when you're in the air and the industry is both essential and moribund at the same time so you it's hard to ask people to get new planes or new engines.
Yeah, airfield. Some older planes are still allowed to use leaded gas because no alternative has been found that works with their engines. And our regulatory system is all about minimizing risk of any given activity, not in minimizing the overall risk to people.
So this is not quite true about when leaded gasoline is used. It is generally used in track specific cars. Vintage cars have long been retrofitted to not need let it gasoline. If those vintage cars have not been retrofitted it's fine because they literally don't put enough stress on the engines to need it.
But there are street legal cars that have a track mode which changes the tune on the car and bypasses the catalytic converters while in that mode. The optimized tune can require 100+ octane gas. The way this is typically achieved is by taking a 118 octane leaded gas that is sold at the race track and mixing it with a lower octane gas to get the octane rating you need for your tune.
Leaded it gas is not actually required to do this. It's just what's used because it's, probably, cheaper than unleaded alternatives. Additionally with unleaded alternative fuels that have very high octanes they generally require a different tune on your car. Because even for racers you can get ethanol blended gas or even pure ethanol which has a high enough octane rating but the tune on your vehicle is different because how it burns in the engine is different.
So typically changes like this don't really happen until there is legislation that pushes the conversion to happen. Which it is long past time for leaded gasoline to completely disappear in every aspect. If there is still some exceedingly limited niche then it needs to be sold as an additive which is controlled and you must show you have a need for this. Although I'm really not sure what that need would be at this point.
Some small engine airplanes do still use leaded gas. I'm not sure if they still do this but as part of pre-flight checks on those small airplanes they would check the gas to make sure it is the correct gas for the plane and then just dump that out onto the ground after they validated it. There's literally no reason for piston engine aircraft to continue to use leaded gasoline either. Especially considering that aircraft are highly regulated with the number of hours that can be on an engine before it's torn down and rebuild. There is plenty of opportunity to update these to unleaded.
What I don't see in the Guardian articles is any measurement of lead levels in the neighboring air and soil, and the difference between that and neighborhoods away from racetracks and airports.
It's shocking that race tracks are still allowed to use leaded gas. Anyone who's using leaded gasoline has a dedicated track only car, so they're not switching between street use and track use. The benefits of leaded gasoline have long sense past and there are suitable replacements that provide the same benefits. Additionally engines that were built for leaded gasoline use that are still in track cars today would have been rebuilt and could have the necessary modifications to not use leaded gasoline.
Farm equipment and certain other off-road equipment might still need leaded gas depending on the situation. This would be typically fairly old equipment at this point, as in 40+ year-old equipment. I certainly wouldn't want to buy any food from a farmer that is still using a leaded gas to power their equipment. That same equipment, if it is not then rebuilt, is likely spewing lots of other dangerous emissions you would not want in your food supply. So I would think that if you still wanted to run let it gasoline for any off-road purpose you should have to justify its use.
I had a John Deere 420 [1] from the 1950s when I first got my farm. It ran great on unleaded but was killed when we switched it from the straight 20 oil specified for it that had become impossible to find to modern multi-viscosity oil -- the gaskets all failed. We traded it in to a tractor enthusiast and replaced it with this tractor [2]
[1] https://www.tractordata.com/farm-tractors/000/0/4/46-john-de...
[2] https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:New_Holland_TC30_HST...
> suitable replacements that provide the same benefits
Eh. It's basically impossible to get past 105 octane on unleaded fuel. Whereas leaded fuels could get you up to 118.
Obviously modern sports cars are designed with much lower compression ratios in mind. But if you are showing off historic engine designs, some of them won't even run without leaded fuels.
No I'm not talking about street cars I'm talking about track only race cars. There is absolutely replacements for this that do not contain lead. Here is only one example.
https://www.epartrade.com/product/2f2ee087-highest-octane-un...
Yes, I understand. But most of the events that PIR runs are using street cars or modern racing series that use lower octane fuels.
But there are also certain events where people are absolutely bringing out 40-50 year old drag racers.
I don't believe that particular product you have linked to has been on the market for over a decade. I suspect the additives they used in place of lead were probably even worse. If you can find an unleaded racing fuel above 110 octane for sale today I will happily eat my words.
The product I linked is 116 octane and is unleaded and does not contain ethanol. I am not exactly sure how long it's been on the market but doing a simple search I can find people referencing it all the way back to 2017.
So at this point even for super high octane needs there is no requirement for running a leaded gasoline anymore and hasn't been for some time.
Ignite Red is 114 octane E90 blend... unleaded...