I briefly login walled some of my writing until I looked into LLMs and realized they don't actually encode anything that would be subject to copyright, and the things they do encode can be a benefit to people trying to develop creatively.
The years-long freakout over it is getting a little old. I'm glad more people are trying to haul some sense into the discussion. It was surreal watching artists wipe out years of uploaded work, the only proof they have against any claims they used AI, only to reupload it with some questionable anti-AI schemes long after it was too late.
I wrote at length on this[0], but the gist is that the loudest and least informed have driven the conversation up to now and it hasn't done anything good. Most people don't seem to have a strong opinion outside a worry that this stuff is finding its way into more parts of life and all the people who know what's going on and could help them navigate it were afraid to speak up.
I briefly login walled some of my writing until I looked into LLMs and realized they don't actually encode anything that would be subject to copyright, and the things they do encode can be a benefit to people trying to develop creatively.
The years-long freakout over it is getting a little old. I'm glad more people are trying to haul some sense into the discussion. It was surreal watching artists wipe out years of uploaded work, the only proof they have against any claims they used AI, only to reupload it with some questionable anti-AI schemes long after it was too late.
I wrote at length on this[0], but the gist is that the loudest and least informed have driven the conversation up to now and it hasn't done anything good. Most people don't seem to have a strong opinion outside a worry that this stuff is finding its way into more parts of life and all the people who know what's going on and could help them navigate it were afraid to speak up.
[0] https://kyefox.com/ai-assisted-creativity/