I feel sorry for people who have to implement this, because neither I nor ChatGPT can find the bill, regulation, or gazette document under discussion. I am not even sure this ministry even has a website?
But do we even know if it's a law, royal decree, or ministerial decree? Will it be receiving parliamentary scrutiny? Do we know if it's in process or already enacted? If a decree that amends another decree, do we at least have an idea where the consolidated (as-amended) version is?
This makes complete sense, we have the system and both itsme and eID readers can be made to only provide age and a uuid. If implemented correctly this would be both secure and privacy preserving.
Trading freedom for security sounds familiar and usually doesn't end good
I feel sorry for people who have to implement this, because neither I nor ChatGPT can find the bill, regulation, or gazette document under discussion. I am not even sure this ministry even has a website?
If approved, it will be published in the “staatsblad” in Dutch, French, and German.
Hah well I would hope so!
But do we even know if it's a law, royal decree, or ministerial decree? Will it be receiving parliamentary scrutiny? Do we know if it's in process or already enacted? If a decree that amends another decree, do we at least have an idea where the consolidated (as-amended) version is?
At this point with the prevalence of bots and its impact on spreading misinformation, I support this.
This makes complete sense, we have the system and both itsme and eID readers can be made to only provide age and a uuid. If implemented correctly this would be both secure and privacy preserving.
I'd rather keep the government out of the loop completely.