> Once they’re in, they take screenshots of posts from parents who describe giving these chemicals [bleach] to their children, often with disastrous results.
> "My son is constantly making a gasping sound,” posted one Kansas mother who claimed to treat her adult son with chlorine dioxide, according to screenshots shared by Eaton and Seigler. “He won’t open his mouth,” a Canadian mom wrote of her 2-year-old’s unwillingness to drink the chlorine dioxide. “He screams. Spits. Flips over.”
Unfortunately it sounds like this isn't limited to people self-administering bleach - instead it is nothing short of child abuse (and abuse of vulnerable adults where it's not...) in many cases.
It's already clear that RFK Jr. will make a lot of unscientific and harmful changes. The new vaccine panel full of anti-vaccine activists, the whole autism study and messaging around that and the recent statement that they'll make drug approvals much faster by skipping animals and using AI instead. MMS is just another well-known pseudo-scientific cure for everything, and plenty of scammers earn money with that bullshit.
These are all absolutely extreme ideas and will cause harm.
I was unaware there was a "bleach community." However, dilute sodium hypochlorite solutions have been used as anti-microbial rinses in dentistry for a while: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9292655/
> That's more like injecting it, rather than just rinsing, or even swallowing (not recommending) it.
Yeah:
> US President Donald Trump has been lambasted by the medical community after suggesting research into whether coronavirus might be treated by injecting disinfectant into the body.
[…]
> "And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside of the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. And I think you said you're going to test that too. Sounds interesting," the president continued.
> "And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning?
Once you have a large, dug-in community of people who neither believe nor trust the scientific mainstream on major public health issues - imagining that you can somehow turn the clock back to the Good Old Days is simply delusional.
I think, if not the Good Old Days, some Good New Days are possible. The tough part is it's going to require some sort of "hitting bottom" and a concomitant reevaluation of some of our baseline societal values. Like with regard to this bleach stuff, you would wind up with thousands of people jailed for child abuse and permanently barred from further contact with their children. On a larger scale, we need to recognize that if the first amendment says that saying "drinking bleach is a good idea" and "drinking bleach is a bad idea" have equal legal status, then we have a problem and need to rethink the first amendment. There needs to be sufficient willpower and fortitude to regard such things as live options.
Whether you phrase it "reevaluation of some of our baseline societal values", or "peacefully resolving the culture wars" - what it would take to actually accomplish makes the antivax, bleach, and similar problems look like rounding errors by compare. :(
As niche movements, yeah. But antivax and bleach treatments as federal policy (which is the threat RFK essentially represents) would have the potential to generate catastrophic results which would look a bit more than a rounding error.
Yes and no. I see them as related because the anti-science and anti-fact stance is itself a component of the culture wars. But yeah, what I'm saying is it might not be entirely peaceful.
> Chlorine dioxide is sold under a variety of names, including … God’s Detox.
My biggest criticism of Darwinism is that it takes generations.
Unfortunately in this case very literally as many instances seem to be parents administering it to their children.
not always...
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37486680/
"The excess death rate among Republican voters was 43% higher than the excess death rate among Democratic voters."
Admittedly, a cherry-picked quote, but it's the salient point of how susceptibility to misinformation can shrink the current generation.
Reading around this, it sounds like bleach has been peddled by some grifters to ignorant parents as something to give to their autistic children.
https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/moms-go-undercover-fig...
> Once they’re in, they take screenshots of posts from parents who describe giving these chemicals [bleach] to their children, often with disastrous results.
> "My son is constantly making a gasping sound,” posted one Kansas mother who claimed to treat her adult son with chlorine dioxide, according to screenshots shared by Eaton and Seigler. “He won’t open his mouth,” a Canadian mom wrote of her 2-year-old’s unwillingness to drink the chlorine dioxide. “He screams. Spits. Flips over.”
Unfortunately it sounds like this isn't limited to people self-administering bleach - instead it is nothing short of child abuse (and abuse of vulnerable adults where it's not...) in many cases.
Definitely one of the more confusing headlines in a while, as an anime fan.
A number of bleach treatments are ultimately child abuse.
I am one to follow the science, but this seems a little like overreach.
"Meta said it was reviewing the groups WIRED flagged and would remove any it determines violate".
Is it the job of the reporter to flag groups covered in the story? Seems like a little bit of inserting itself into the news. Report and move on.
Couldn’t flagged simply mean they requested for comment about the group thus bringing it to their attention?
I weep for the poor kids with parents in the "Bleach community".
Non-paywall: https://archive.ph/rK28d
I thought this was about the anime. Now I'm disappointed.
It's already clear that RFK Jr. will make a lot of unscientific and harmful changes. The new vaccine panel full of anti-vaccine activists, the whole autism study and messaging around that and the recent statement that they'll make drug approvals much faster by skipping animals and using AI instead. MMS is just another well-known pseudo-scientific cure for everything, and plenty of scammers earn money with that bullshit.
These are all absolutely extreme ideas and will cause harm.
He really is a symbol of just how broken American politics are.
I was unaware there was a "bleach community." However, dilute sodium hypochlorite solutions have been used as anti-microbial rinses in dentistry for a while: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9292655/
I believe "rinse" is the key there.
And also "dilute"
And even in a professional setting, there can be accidents.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24090808/
That's more like injecting it, rather than just rinsing, or even swallowing (not recommending) it.
> That's more like injecting it, rather than just rinsing, or even swallowing (not recommending) it.
Yeah:
> US President Donald Trump has been lambasted by the medical community after suggesting research into whether coronavirus might be treated by injecting disinfectant into the body.
[…]
> "And then I said, supposing you brought the light inside of the body, which you can do either through the skin or in some other way. And I think you said you're going to test that too. Sounds interesting," the president continued.
> "And then I see the disinfectant where it knocks it out in a minute. One minute. And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning?
> "So it'd be interesting to check that."
* https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-52407177
Do not under-estimate the left-hand side of the bell curve.
But that's talking about light, not bleach? What does "bringing light into the body" have to do with "injecting bleach"?
Once you have a large, dug-in community of people who neither believe nor trust the scientific mainstream on major public health issues - imagining that you can somehow turn the clock back to the Good Old Days is simply delusional.
I think, if not the Good Old Days, some Good New Days are possible. The tough part is it's going to require some sort of "hitting bottom" and a concomitant reevaluation of some of our baseline societal values. Like with regard to this bleach stuff, you would wind up with thousands of people jailed for child abuse and permanently barred from further contact with their children. On a larger scale, we need to recognize that if the first amendment says that saying "drinking bleach is a good idea" and "drinking bleach is a bad idea" have equal legal status, then we have a problem and need to rethink the first amendment. There needs to be sufficient willpower and fortitude to regard such things as live options.
Whether you phrase it "reevaluation of some of our baseline societal values", or "peacefully resolving the culture wars" - what it would take to actually accomplish makes the antivax, bleach, and similar problems look like rounding errors by compare. :(
As niche movements, yeah. But antivax and bleach treatments as federal policy (which is the threat RFK essentially represents) would have the potential to generate catastrophic results which would look a bit more than a rounding error.
Yes and no. I see them as related because the anti-science and anti-fact stance is itself a component of the culture wars. But yeah, what I'm saying is it might not be entirely peaceful.