> "We find that comments by GPT‑5-Codex are less likely to be incorrect or unimportant" -- less unimportant comments in code is definitely an improvement!
This seems to be a misunderstanding. In the original OpenAI article, comment here is about code review comment, not comment in code.
It's annoying to see a link to a Theo video -- same guy who went with Simon to OpenAI's GPT-5 glazefest and had to backpedal when everyone realized what a shill he is.
I know neither of them are journalists -- I'm probably expecting too much -- but Simon should know better.
> "We find that comments by GPT‑5-Codex are less likely to be incorrect or unimportant" -- less unimportant comments in code is definitely an improvement!
This seems to be a misunderstanding. In the original OpenAI article, comment here is about code review comment, not comment in code.
It's annoying to see a link to a Theo video -- same guy who went with Simon to OpenAI's GPT-5 glazefest and had to backpedal when everyone realized what a shill he is.
I know neither of them are journalists -- I'm probably expecting too much -- but Simon should know better.
While not a journalist, Simon definitely has a background in journalism.
He was one of the original authors of Django, back when it was a “web framework for journalists with deadlines”.
Exactly. That's why I said he should know better. He never should have gone to that event to hype GPT-5 under the guise of "testing" it out.
The pelican is not very good
But probably fast
Would be faster if it got on the bike