Fortunately when it comes to the $20-30 TV devices there are plenty of options that can be made mostly bloat free that you can install anything you want on.
> but the real issue appears to have been the apps’ use of resource-monetization services that grant cybercriminals access to devices and residential IPs for malicious activity.
So the apps are malware that function as residential proxies.
It's pretty incredible how many apps have this kind of functionality. There are some sketch af sites that sell access to these proxies. I took a look to do some web scraping a while ago. In the end, I just ended up using TOR with a Rust API and that worked a lot better and made me feel a lot less dirty, in addition to being free.
Place the laptop behind/below the TV, hook it up via HDMI, install whatever software you want on it (I use plain linux and VLC, but you can install Jellyfin and use the web interface if you want to), use a bluetooth keyboard/mouse combo to control it. You can enable USB wakeup if you want to minimize power usage, but you have to make sure the keyboard is plugged into a USB port that's powered when shutdown then (if that's even possible given your config).
> Flix Vision has been shown to use resource monetizing services that pay app developers in exchange for using the device CPU and network traffic while their app is running. Live NetTV has been criticized for doing the same. These kinds of proxy monetization services have been classified as Riskware and accused of giving cybercriminals access to devices and residential IPs for malicious operations.
> It seems far more likely that Amazon targeted and disabled these two apps because they functioned as residential proxy providers, rather than due to any role in facilitating unauthorized access to copyrighted content. For over a decade, Amazon has shown through inaction that it is unwilling to combat piracy outside of its appstore by endlessly disabling third-party piracy apps. However, the possibility of a network of unknowingly compromised Fire TV devices being used as gateways for cybercrimes appears to have been sufficient motivation for Amazon to take action and block the apps.
Sigh. Yeah no. This is a good thing. I'm sure they're not worried about stuff like Jellyfin or SmartTubeTV.
Fortunately when it comes to the $20-30 TV devices there are plenty of options that can be made mostly bloat free that you can install anything you want on.
Like what?
Onn devices from Walmart
Xiaomi TV Box
Only source is the Sun and there has been no official response from Amazon?
I'll wait till this can be confirmed before deciding what to think of it.
that, plus the downgrade and lock option
> but the real issue appears to have been the apps’ use of resource-monetization services that grant cybercriminals access to devices and residential IPs for malicious activity.
So the apps are malware that function as residential proxies.
Way to bury the lede.
RTFA. That was for the previous round of blocks, and those apps were restored after the offending behavior was removed.
The current round of blocks is targeting apps that support piracy even if they don’t have any other malicious behavior.
It's pretty incredible how many apps have this kind of functionality. There are some sketch af sites that sell access to these proxies. I took a look to do some web scraping a while ago. In the end, I just ended up using TOR with a Rust API and that worked a lot better and made me feel a lot less dirty, in addition to being free.
Welp! There goes stremio
So what’s the alternative android stick that users will soon be purchasing instead?
I purchased an Onn TV from Walmart for $25 and am very happy with it after 2 years of using it.
Amazon is sentencing the Fire TV to irrelevance with these dumb decisions, just like the Fire Phone.
Nvidia Shield is a really good device.
It's pretty expensive. And didn't Nvidia started pushing ads?
Some backdoored piece of shit from China
As opposed to this obviously backdoored piece of sh*t from America (that was made in China)
I keep my old laptops mainly for use as tv boxes.
Even for a 5 year old laptop, my current tv laptop has much more power than a fire stick and I can run whatever I like.
Can you give some more details? I have a few old laptops which I can re-purpose for this.
Place the laptop behind/below the TV, hook it up via HDMI, install whatever software you want on it (I use plain linux and VLC, but you can install Jellyfin and use the web interface if you want to), use a bluetooth keyboard/mouse combo to control it. You can enable USB wakeup if you want to minimize power usage, but you have to make sure the keyboard is plugged into a USB port that's powered when shutdown then (if that's even possible given your config).
How do you control them?
You have USB receivers that respond to regular remote controls.
I would try KDE connect to do keyboard or mouse input.
[dupe] Fire TV: Amazon to block piracy apps in the future
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45774284
Good. Think of the media industry. If those people weren't able to do their work for millions they'd be doing it for tens on street corners.
This year piracy apps, next year Plex/Jellyfin? Or will they call those piracy apps already?
Just Jellyfin. Plex, being a for-profit corporation, will pay for FireTV app store placement.
You should check out the details on the apps in the article. They’re pretty clearly malware at best.
Right, and security is regularly used to justify starting down a path that's really about profit.
> Flix Vision has been shown to use resource monetizing services that pay app developers in exchange for using the device CPU and network traffic while their app is running. Live NetTV has been criticized for doing the same. These kinds of proxy monetization services have been classified as Riskware and accused of giving cybercriminals access to devices and residential IPs for malicious operations.
> It seems far more likely that Amazon targeted and disabled these two apps because they functioned as residential proxy providers, rather than due to any role in facilitating unauthorized access to copyrighted content. For over a decade, Amazon has shown through inaction that it is unwilling to combat piracy outside of its appstore by endlessly disabling third-party piracy apps. However, the possibility of a network of unknowingly compromised Fire TV devices being used as gateways for cybercrimes appears to have been sufficient motivation for Amazon to take action and block the apps.
Sigh. Yeah no. This is a good thing. I'm sure they're not worried about stuff like Jellyfin or SmartTubeTV.