From a marketing perspective I'd argue it's good naming, since it sells the value of the library, rather than simply its feature/s. (i.e. its feature is 'handling webhooks' but its value is in allowing (the dev) to not have to deal with webhooks.
Steve Jobs once quipped about a similar thing he observed in the dairy industry's 'Got Milk?' marketing campaign, which focused on the absence of the product https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzPwMguPasM
With the library you’re able to use stripe without thinking about web hooks. The library is named based on what it enables a user to do, not how it works internally.
Thanks for sharing this! I had done a PWA that displays some revenue forecasting[1] based on Stripe Subscriptions but I found their APIs can be slow[2]. Having that data synced up in a db sounds like a good enhancement so will definitely look into this more.
Yes, this is one of the bigger use-cases for this library. Lots of folks want custom analytics on their Stripe data and this provides a nice way to do just that.
Let me know how you find it! Happy to implement any fixes and PRs welcome!
> You don't have to figure out which webhooks you need or write listeners for each one. The library handles all of that. This follows the approach of libraries like dj-stripe in the Django world (https://dj-stripe.dev/).
I don’t figure out these types of things anymore. I just make sure they work in dev, staging and production.
It is indeed painful to figure out all the Stripe events one needs to handle. However, for me it’s worth it to do it once, and then be able to handle the interactions between my app and Stripe directly, instead of adding more layers.
That’s a fair point. But of course, this library also helps with other matters - wallets, credits and a code as config based system which can be quite useful too.
And also, if you record all the webhooks events (and a backfill), that basically gives you your whole Stripe data available locally - I’ve actually put it to good use in diagnosing payment failure issues before.
Great question. Basically, you would change your billing.config.ts and update the price.
Then, you run the `sync` command - it matches prices by a composite key: `productId:amount:currency:interval`. Since the amount has changed, it won't find a match for the old price. So, it will create a new price in Stripe and update the Price ID. Your new customers automatically get the new price in the Pricing Table component.
Your old subscriptions stay on the old price - which is still active in Stripe. We haven't added support for migrating these customers to the new price yet but it's in the roadmap!
I would like to add that we've tried making the porcelain / user API for the library to best fit today's commonly uses SaaS pricing models so most actions usually do what you would expect (like this price update) but, it's hard to strike a balance between customizability and the _just works_ factor.
> Stripe's API has a 100 rpm rate limit
Small correction, 100 rps
source: https://docs.stripe.com/rate-limits#:~:text=the%20number%20o...
Haha "Stripe-no-webhooks library"
Library based on processing ... wait for it ... webhooks".
From a marketing perspective I'd argue it's good naming, since it sells the value of the library, rather than simply its feature/s. (i.e. its feature is 'handling webhooks' but its value is in allowing (the dev) to not have to deal with webhooks.
Steve Jobs once quipped about a similar thing he observed in the dairy industry's 'Got Milk?' marketing campaign, which focused on the absence of the product https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XzPwMguPasM
With the library you’re able to use stripe without thinking about web hooks. The library is named based on what it enables a user to do, not how it works internally.
haha yes, it’s definitely a bit of a silly name. The idea is you the user does not have to deal with the webhooks!
Thanks for sharing this! I had done a PWA that displays some revenue forecasting[1] based on Stripe Subscriptions but I found their APIs can be slow[2]. Having that data synced up in a db sounds like a good enhancement so will definitely look into this more.
[1] https://github.com/hbcondo/revenut-app
[2] https://github.com/stripe/stripe-dotnet/issues/2284#issuecom...
Yes, this is one of the bigger use-cases for this library. Lots of folks want custom analytics on their Stripe data and this provides a nice way to do just that.
Let me know how you find it! Happy to implement any fixes and PRs welcome!
Thank you for sharing. I've been using the Better-Auth's Stripe integration but it has some quirks.
Which Stripe version does your lib support? Clover?
Hi HN, library creator here.
I've linked a demo app linked in the post to try this out:
<https://snw-test.vercel.app>
It uses Clerk for auth and Clerk seems to be having problems:
<https://downdetector.com/status/clerk-inc/>
So if you're having any issues loading the app, you may have to wait a bit!
> You don't have to figure out which webhooks you need or write listeners for each one. The library handles all of that. This follows the approach of libraries like dj-stripe in the Django world (https://dj-stripe.dev/).
I don’t figure out these types of things anymore. I just make sure they work in dev, staging and production.
It is indeed painful to figure out all the Stripe events one needs to handle. However, for me it’s worth it to do it once, and then be able to handle the interactions between my app and Stripe directly, instead of adding more layers.
That’s a fair point. But of course, this library also helps with other matters - wallets, credits and a code as config based system which can be quite useful too.
And also, if you record all the webhooks events (and a backfill), that basically gives you your whole Stripe data available locally - I’ve actually put it to good use in diagnosing payment failure issues before.
A related, generalized idea: https://github.com/webhookdb/webhookdb
This is really cool. How do you handle changes of pricing with something like this?
Great question. Basically, you would change your billing.config.ts and update the price.
Then, you run the `sync` command - it matches prices by a composite key: `productId:amount:currency:interval`. Since the amount has changed, it won't find a match for the old price. So, it will create a new price in Stripe and update the Price ID. Your new customers automatically get the new price in the Pricing Table component.
Your old subscriptions stay on the old price - which is still active in Stripe. We haven't added support for migrating these customers to the new price yet but it's in the roadmap!
I would like to add that we've tried making the porcelain / user API for the library to best fit today's commonly uses SaaS pricing models so most actions usually do what you would expect (like this price update) but, it's hard to strike a balance between customizability and the _just works_ factor.
why call it no webhook when it's wait for it a webhook?
Well it’s a silly name, yes. _You_ don’t have to deal with webhooks - it happens in the background and is taken care of by the library!
That's not the same as no webhooks. It's totally using webhooks.
> It's totally using webhooks.
Nothing gets by you!
If used, will you now have to be PCI-compliant?